Page 2 of 2
Re: SF secrecy
Posted: Sat 27 Nov, 2010 9:42 pm
by Tab
Well they Government don't need to do anything on this matter as they can safely leave it in the hands of Walters, which will get every one confused.
Re: SF secrecy
Posted: Sun 28 Nov, 2010 1:09 pm
by Ares-God of War
Hi Timex,
yes i can see that NI would have a influence on British SAS.
I have another question
on evaluating Special Forces people put the Aus and NZ SAS below the British SAS in rankings, why is this werent they trained the same at the beginning so how have they changed?
Ares
Re: SF secrecy
Posted: Sat 12 Feb, 2011 12:10 am
by gunner75
NI. as straight forward as that. As for the top ten hit parade of special forces - bin it. Who comes up with these evaluations? Superbeings that have served in all 3? (i.e NZ, OZ, BRIT). End of the day the concept is British, we have been going the longest, picking up the experiences and cross overs are learning from us. Britain/England is 'affectionately' known as the warrior nation for a reason.
Re: SF secrecy
Posted: Sun 15 May, 2011 8:58 pm
by Ares-God of War
gunner75 wrote: Britain/England is 'affectionately' known as the warrior nation for a reason.
Hooorahh, sorry wrong nation
but you know what i mean.
Ares
Re: SF secrecy
Posted: Wed 25 May, 2011 1:55 am
by rw1
Andy, and chris ryan are a pair of goons, met them both what a bunch of sacks, startdom has hit them on the head.
Chris Ryan taught me how to make bread on the camp here, what a mong, none of the whole getting water in the desert, survival,if i wanted to be a baker i wouldnt have signed up the pleb, if i had a rollin pin and flour maybe it would be of use, The stuff they have leaked has been put on tv shows, in minor detail, i have watched hundreds of these, and they suck, best to take it straight from the goats mouth mate, there all bull.
Onto the question!
1) security, there not so special if everyone can do what they do, and lets be fair the families would be targeted, just look at the I.R.A and there tactics. They did similar things, what better way to discourage troops. It the soldiers bibles issue of 1998 it does have a passage on family security.
2) Lets be fair if you were looking to take out troops, you would take SF's out first, get rid of the heavy damage dealers.
3) Onto targeting and security, they would be followed.. not much use then, if you look into the S.A.S for example, they only take the grey men. The ones who arnt noticed for good reason. There a select few, the best at what they do, no use if they got killed because someone pointed them out in the street lyk.