Share This Page:
Private Messages
-
- Guest
Private Messages
I had mentioned to another member, by PM, that this subject had run its course. Also it had nothing to do with the original thread subject.
However it is turning into quite a discussion subject, so I thought I'd start a thread for PMs.
However it is turning into quite a discussion subject, so I thought I'd start a thread for PMs.
-
- Member
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 4:19 pm
- Location: Not in UK
My view coincides with your own Rogue.
Basically, my view is that unless the sender of a PM specifically asks to enter into an agreement of confidentiality with the receiver of the PM then the receiver owns the right to do what he/she wishes with the details contained in the PM.
Private simply means it has been "privately" sent from one forum member to another i.e. not on the open forum.
Most private letters are not confidential, which is why,years ago, those that were both were marked "private and confidential"
i.e. private does not mean confidential.
A private meeting or discussion for example is only open to a small number of people not to the general public, that doesn't mean what they are going to discuss is confidential.
Basically, my view is that unless the sender of a PM specifically asks to enter into an agreement of confidentiality with the receiver of the PM then the receiver owns the right to do what he/she wishes with the details contained in the PM.
Private simply means it has been "privately" sent from one forum member to another i.e. not on the open forum.
Most private letters are not confidential, which is why,years ago, those that were both were marked "private and confidential"
i.e. private does not mean confidential.
A private meeting or discussion for example is only open to a small number of people not to the general public, that doesn't mean what they are going to discuss is confidential.
-
- Guest
There have been many points made on this issue to date but I thought I would just clarify my stance. The following points are not open to different interpretations and semantics. They are exactly what they say. Feel free to offer your own.
1. The precise definition of the word 'private' is not in contention.
2. The term 'Private Message' is simply a label for an alternate means of communication between forum members who decide for any reason not to inlcude other forum members.
3. The issue is whether PMs should be subject to absolute confidentiality or not.
4. The vast majority of PMs I have received and sent are benign and of little or no interest to anyone else other than the people involved. In most cases I would not reveal those PMs.
5. Those in communication should make a mutual agreement about confidentiality if anything contentious is being discussed. As it is likely that this is the area of discussion where problems may arise.
6. It has been pointed out that senders should be granted the opportunity to delete or withdraw a PM before the recipient broadcasts it. I would say the sender may make the request but the decision lies with the recipient.
7. If you post an abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented message then you have contravened the terms of agreement and have forfeited your right to confidentiality. If the sender then claims the right to absolute confidentiality he/she unfairly trumps the recipients rights.
8. The equation is simple if you don't want your PMs promulgated in public then don't post abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented messages or suffer the consequences.
9. Being upset or drunk is not a get out clause. If you post PM nonsense then reap the whirlwind.
10. Any drips see a plumber.
As my old Sgt Major used to say "Hic". He liked a beer at weekends.
1. The precise definition of the word 'private' is not in contention.
2. The term 'Private Message' is simply a label for an alternate means of communication between forum members who decide for any reason not to inlcude other forum members.
3. The issue is whether PMs should be subject to absolute confidentiality or not.
4. The vast majority of PMs I have received and sent are benign and of little or no interest to anyone else other than the people involved. In most cases I would not reveal those PMs.
5. Those in communication should make a mutual agreement about confidentiality if anything contentious is being discussed. As it is likely that this is the area of discussion where problems may arise.
6. It has been pointed out that senders should be granted the opportunity to delete or withdraw a PM before the recipient broadcasts it. I would say the sender may make the request but the decision lies with the recipient.
7. If you post an abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented message then you have contravened the terms of agreement and have forfeited your right to confidentiality. If the sender then claims the right to absolute confidentiality he/she unfairly trumps the recipients rights.
8. The equation is simple if you don't want your PMs promulgated in public then don't post abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented messages or suffer the consequences.
9. Being upset or drunk is not a get out clause. If you post PM nonsense then reap the whirlwind.
10. Any drips see a plumber.
As my old Sgt Major used to say "Hic". He liked a beer at weekends.
-
- Guest
-
- Guest
Bizarre. The issue crops up on another thread and there are plenty of comments. Now it has its own thread and the ideas dry up.
Wholley, my apologies. But it seemed it was turning into a good, robust discussion and was detracting from the the original thread.
Sometimes even I get it wrong.
As my old Sgt Major used to say, "Never give up, never surrender". Stirring stuff from the old warhorse.
Wholley, my apologies. But it seemed it was turning into a good, robust discussion and was detracting from the the original thread.
Sometimes even I get it wrong.
As my old Sgt Major used to say, "Never give up, never surrender". Stirring stuff from the old warhorse.
-
- Member
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat 16 Jun, 2007 8:25 pm
- Location: Somewhere